Donald Sloan
6'3" point36.2 years old
Profile Positions On/Off Stats Game Logs Lineups Trends

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Offense Defense
Year Age Team MIN Diff Exp W Pts/Poss eFG% TOV% ORB% FT Rate Pts/Poss eFG% TOV% ORB% FT Rate
On Court 15-16 27.8 BKN 1279 23 -6.3 25 45 105.3 65 50.9% 77 13.9% 7 22.2% 28 18.8 14 111.6 14 53.1% 19 13.5% 52 26.5% 99 15.7
PG 96% 29 -5.8 26 50 105.1 68 51.0% 77 13.9% 2 21.7% 27 18.6 21 110.9 18 52.9% 18 13.4% 52 26.3% 97 15.6
SG 4% -17.1 10 110.6 49.5% 12.5% 32.1% 21.9 127.7 58.9% 15.8% 30.2% 17.9
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 26.8 IND 1049 37 -3.4 31 17 99.6 16 46.6% 27 16.3% 66 29.0% 30 18.9 78 103.0 79 48.2% 15 13.4% 94 24.5% 70 19.5
PG 99% 40 -3.5 31 26 99.1 22 46.4% 31 16.3% 66 29.1% 35 18.7 82 102.6 80 47.9% 20 13.4% 94 24.6% 68 19.6
SG 1% +12.5 62 162.5 76.9% 12.5% 0.0% 46.2 150.0 81.2% 5.6% 0.0% 6.3
SF
PF
C
On Court 13-14 25.8 IND 311 5 -14.9 9 1 92.2 11 46.4% 7 17.9% 11 23.6% 10 17.5 47 107.2 64 49.7% 3 12.5% 86 26.1% 60 21.2
PG 100% 8 -14.9 9 3 92.2 14 46.4% 12 17.9% 9 23.6% 13 17.5 48 107.2 66 49.7% 4 12.5% 81 26.1% 64 21.2
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 12-13 24.8 NOH 6 -50.0 0 50.0 31.2% 40.0% 28.6% 0.0 100.0 50.0% 8.3% 0.0% 50.0
PG 100% -50.0 0 50.0 31.2% 40.0% 28.6% 0.0 100.0 50.0% 8.3% 0.0% 50.0
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 12-13 24.8 CLE 247 3 -14.8 9 0 89.7 1 41.7% 7 17.9% 66 30.4% 21 17.8 65 104.5 78 48.4% 37 15.3% 61 28.6% 6 26.4
PG 99% 5 -15.2 8 2 89.4 1 41.8% 12 18.0% 58 30.1% 23 17.3 60 104.6 74 48.3% 46 15.5% 61 28.6% 6 26.5
SG 1% +16.7 74 116.7 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 50.0 100.0 50.0% 0.0% 25.0% 16.7
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 CLE 543 0 -23.0 4 5 93.4 2 42.1% 36 16.7% 69 30.9% 49 20.3 1 116.4 7 52.4% 3 12.1% 10 32.9% 66 19.9
PG 100% 1 -23.0 4 8 93.4 4 42.1% 41 16.7% 68 30.9% 53 20.3 3 116.4 9 52.4% 8 12.1% 10 32.9% 67 19.9
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 NOH 41 +4.1 52 104.1 51.6% 23.3% 42.9% 21.0 100.0 43.1% 17.3% 41.9% 18.1
PG 100% +4.1 52 104.1 51.6% 23.3% 42.9% 21.0 100.0 43.1% 17.3% 41.9% 18.1
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 ATL 5 +38.9 82 88.9 40.0% 22.2% 33.3% 80.0 50.0 25.0% 25.0% 33.3% 0.0
PG 100% +38.9 82 88.9 40.0% 22.2% 33.3% 80.0 50.0 25.0% 25.0% 33.3% 0.0
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Offensive Overview

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN Usage PSA AST% AST:Usg TOV%
On Court 15-16 27.8 BKN 1279 28 19.7% 66 107.1 48 29.2% 77 1.48 61 13.6%
PG 96% 28 19.7% 64 107.0 51 29.6% 82 1.50 59 14.2%
SG 4% 20.2% 108.7 20.0% 0.99 0.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 26.8 IND 1049 29 21.3% 48 102.2 53 29.5% 66 1.38 74 12.5%
PG 99% 27 21.4% 47 101.7 52 29.6% 66 1.39 71 12.6%
SG 1% 16.7% 200.0 22.2% 1.33 0.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 13-14 25.8 IND 311 24 18.8% 19 87.8 31 23.9% 64 1.27 54 14.5%
PG 100% 22 18.8% 19 87.8 31 23.9% 64 1.27 58 14.5%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 12-13 24.8 CLE 247 33 20.6% 14 93.1 35 28.6% 63 1.39 90 11.6%
PG 99% 33 20.5% 14 92.9 41 29.0% 67 1.42 88 11.8%
SG 1% 25.0% 100.0 0.0% 0.00 0.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 CLE 543 22 19.9% 17 89.1 56 29.6% 80 1.49 38 16.2%
PG 100% 20 19.9% 19 89.1 53 29.6% 80 1.49 41 16.2%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 NOH 41 27.0% 75.0 32.0% 1.18 17.0%
PG 100% 27.0% 75.0 32.0% 1.18 17.0%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 ATL 5 22.2% 0.0 0.0% 0.00 50.0%
PG 100% 22.2% 0.0 0.0% 0.00 50.0%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Overall

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN eFG% 2P% 3P% FT% ASTD%
All		 ASTD%
Rim		 ASTD%
Mid		 ASTD%
Three
On Court 15-16 27.8 BKN 1279 64 49.7% 46 45.8% 77 39.8% 37 75.8% 21 46% 13 41% 79 11% 25 86%
PG 96% 64 49.7% 52 46.0% 77 39.5% 39 76.3% 21 45% 15 41% 79 12% 25 85%
SG 4% 50.0% 42.9% 42.9% 66.7% 56% 40% 0% 100%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 26.8 IND 1049 48 47.3% 66 46.7% 38 32.2% 33 77.9% 76 27% 89 14% 97 3% 45 71%
PG 99% 45 47.1% 65 46.4% 38 32.2% 31 77.3% 74 27% 89 14% 95 3% 45 71%
SG 1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0% 0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 13-14 25.8 IND 311 25 42.7% 81 49.1% 4 20.7% 56.2% 71 31% 88 17% 78 14% 2 100%
PG 100% 24 42.7% 80 49.1% 2 20.7% 56.2% 71 31% 88 17% 78 14% 2 100%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 12-13 24.8 CLE 247 14 40.7% 12 34.5% 91 41.2% 80.0% 43 41% 92 14% 47 23% 0 100%
PG 99% 14 41.2% 12 35.1% 91 41.2% 78.3% 43 41% 92 14% 47 23% 0 100%
SG 1% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 CLE 543 23 41.2% 55 44.4% 2 11.1% 48 80.8% 48 37% 30 30% 22 38% 2 100%
PG 100% 23 41.2% 55 44.4% 2 11.1% 46 80.8% 47 37% 30 30% 20 38% 2 100%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 NOH 41 35.7% 41.7% 0.0% 50.0% 20% 33% 0%
PG 100% 35.7% 41.7% 0.0% 50.0% 20% 33% 0%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 ATL 5 0.0% 0.0%
PG 100% 0.0% 0.0%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Frequency

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
% of Shot Attempts
Year Age Team MIN eFG% Rim Short
Mid		 Long
Mid		 All
Mid		 Corner
Three		 Non
Corner		 All
Three
On Court 15-16 27.8 BKN 1279 64 49.7% 90 46% 18 11% 51 18% 20 29% 74 8% 33 17% 44 25%
PG 96% 64 49.7% 90 42% 16 11% 57 20% 26 31% 72 8% 34 20% 46 27%
SG 4% 50.0% 52% 14% 0% 14% 19% 14% 33%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 26.8 IND 1049 48 47.3% 73 36% 37 15% 26 15% 18 30% 55 5% 65 29% 65 34%
PG 99% 45 47.1% 74 34% 35 14% 27 16% 18 30% 55 5% 65 31% 63 36%
SG 1% 100.0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 13-14 25.8 IND 311 25 42.7% 56 31% 42 16% 41 19% 32 35% 86 12% 46 22% 58 34%
PG 100% 24 42.7% 56 29% 42 16% 44 20% 27 35% 88 12% 44 23% 58 35%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 12-13 24.8 CLE 247 14 40.7% 57 33% 92 29% 35 19% 76 48% 73 7% 16 13% 24 20%
PG 99% 14 41.2% 47 24% 92 31% 41 22% 90 53% 76 8% 16 15% 31 23%
SG 1% 0.0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 CLE 543 23 41.2% 53 30% 73 22% 88 37% 89 59% 25 2% 16 9% 11 11%
PG 100% 23 41.2% 55 29% 69 22% 88 38% 91 59% 23 3% 14 9% 11 12%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 NOH 41 35.7% 47% 20% 20% 40% 7% 7% 13%
PG 100% 35.7% 43% 21% 21% 43% 7% 7% 14%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 ATL 5 0.0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%
PG 100% 0.0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Accuracy

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
FG%
Year Age Team MIN eFG% Rim Short
Mid		 Long
Mid		 All
Mid		 Corner
Three		 Non
Corner		 All
Three
On Court 15-16 27.8 BKN 1279 64 49.7% 31 53% 34 36% 31 35% 31 35% 47 39% 81 39% 73 39%
PG 96% 64 49.7% 36 54% 36 36% 30 35% 30 35% 26 33% 88 41% 73 39%
SG 4% 50.0% 45% 33% 33% 75% 0% 43%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 26.8 IND 1049 48 47.3% 69 59% 61 40% 11 25% 11 33% 16 29% 42 33% 38 32%
PG 99% 45 47.1% 66 59% 63 40% 11 25% 13 33% 14 29% 42 33% 38 32%
SG 1% 100.0% 100%
SF
PF
C
On Court 13-14 25.8 IND 311 25 42.7% 29 50% 68 38% 98 56% 95 48% 30% 0 16% 2 21%
PG 100% 24 42.7% 25 50% 64 38% 98 56% 95 48% 30% 0 16% 2 21%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 12-13 24.8 CLE 247 14 40.7% 2 37% 43 35% 14 31% 18 33% 50% 36% 89 41%
PG 99% 14 41.2% 6 39% 43 35% 16 31% 18 33% 50% 36% 89 41%
SG 1% 0.0% 0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 CLE 543 23 41.2% 44 52% 80 42% 55 40% 66 41% 50% 0% 2 11%
PG 100% 23 41.2% 47 52% 81 42% 55 40% 66 41% 50% 0% 2 11%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 NOH 41 35.7% 50% 33% 33% 33% 0% 0% 0%
PG 100% 35.7% 50% 33% 33% 33% 0% 0% 0%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 ATL 5 0.0% 0% 0%
PG 100% 0.0% 0% 0%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Foul Drawing

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN FT% SFLD% FFLD% AND1%
On Court 15-16 27.8 BKN 1279 37 75.8% 70 11.2% 59 1.8% 30 17.1%
PG 96% 39 76.3% 75 11.6% 66 1.8% 30 17.5%
SG 4% 66.7% 4.5% 0.8% 0.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 26.8 IND 1049 33 77.9% 60 9.3% 18 1.2% 53 21.2%
PG 99% 31 77.3% 60 9.3% 18 1.2% 50 21.2%
SG 1% 100.0% 0.0% 5.6%
SF
PF
C
On Court 13-14 25.8 IND 311 56.2% 25 4.7% 53 1.7% 0 0.0%
PG 100% 56.2% 24 4.7% 56 1.7% 0 0.0%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 12-13 24.8 CLE 247 80.0% 98 16.3% 37 1.6% 57 21.4%
PG 99% 78.3% 98 15.5% 39 1.7% 63 23.1%
SG 1% 100.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 CLE 543 48 80.8% 30 6.2% 30 1.3% 47 20.0%
PG 100% 46 80.8% 31 6.2% 31 1.3% 47 20.0%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 NOH 41 50.0% 6.7% 3.4% 0.0%
PG 100% 50.0% 6.7% 3.4% 0.0%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 ATL 5 0.0% 0.0%
PG 100% 0.0% 0.0%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Defense and Rebounding

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN BLK% STL% FOUL% fgOR% fgDR% ftOR% ftDR%
On Court 15-16 27.8 BKN 1279 20 0.2% 15 1.1% 93 2.4% 28 1.4% 90 12.9% 0 0.0% 33 1.8%
PG 96% 21 0.2% 16 1.1% 93 2.4% 23 1.4% 90 13.0% 0 0.0% 33 1.8%
SG 4% 0.0% 0.8% 3.4% 1.9% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 26.8 IND 1049 0 0.0% 6 0.9% 97 1.8% 13 1.1% 81 11.7% 0 0.0% 85 8.2%
PG 99% 0 0.0% 5 1.0% 97 1.8% 16 1.1% 79 11.7% 0 0.0% 85 8.2%
SG 1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 13-14 25.8 IND 311 27 0.2% 36 1.4% 90 2.1% 29 1.4% 81 10.5% 0 0.0% 100 12.5%
PG 100% 27 0.2% 36 1.4% 90 2.1% 31 1.4% 85 10.5% 0 0.0% 100 12.5%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 12-13 24.8 CLE 247 0 0.0% 0 0.7% 45 2.9% 29 1.1% 88 10.5% 0 0.0% 94 10.0%
PG 99% 0 0.0% 0 0.7% 57 2.8% 27 1.2% 73 9.8% 0 0.0% 94 10.0%
SG 1% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 0.0% 50.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 CLE 543 53 0.3% 5 0.8% 78 2.4% 78 2.6% 23 7.2% 0 0.0% 72 4.5%
PG 100% 50 0.3% 5 0.8% 78 2.4% 77 2.6% 27 7.2% 0 0.0% 72 4.5%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 NOH 41 0.0% 2.3% 2.3% 6.2% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0%
PG 100% 0.0% 2.3% 2.3% 6.2% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 11-12 23.8 ATL 5 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 0.0% 16.7%
PG 100% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 0.0% 16.7%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table
The rest of this page is for subscribers only.
Already a member?
Click to login
    It includes:
  • On/off/position stats for team and opponent shooting by location
  • On/off/position stats for team and opponent play context (transition/half court/putbacks)
Try Insider stats free for one week,
then just $5/month after that
Subscribe Now