David Andersen
6'11" big41.1 years old #36 pick in 2002

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Offense Defense
Year Age Team MIN Diff Exp W Pts/Poss eFG% TOV% ORB% FT Rate Pts/Poss eFG% TOV% ORB% FT Rate
On Court 10-11 30.4 NOH 192 13 -9.8 18 43 105.3 79 51.6% 21 16.9% 64 30.0% 4 17.4 5 115.1 1 56.3% 58 15.6% 76 27.2% 22 25.9
PG
SG
SF
PF 80% 46 -3.8 31 65 108.4 83 51.7% 48 15.4% 89 32.6% 1 14.4 20 112.2 8 53.7% 36 14.7% 82 26.5% 17 29.1
C 20% -32.3 1 93.4 50.9% 22.4% 17.2% 32.1 125.7 65.6% 18.9% 30.8% 14.1
On Court 10-11 30.4 TOR 140 87 +7.3 59 79 110.3 44 49.4% 96 13.6% 81 31.6% 79 24.7 83 103.0 68 49.1% 93 17.9% 52 28.8% 46 23.8
PG
SG
SF
PF 37% +11.6 68 110.5 50.6% 11.6% 30.6% 19.5 99.0 46.3% 14.6% 25.5% 23.2
C 63% +4.9 54 110.2 48.7% 14.7% 32.2% 27.6 105.2 50.7% 19.8% 30.9% 24.1
On Court 09-10 29.4 HOU 849 76 +4.0 51 72 109.6 36 49.0% 79 14.3% 81 31.6% 72 24.3 70 105.6 67 49.3% 61 15.6% 21 30.7% 93 18.7
PG
SG
SF
PF 4% -23.4 3 90.0 47.4% 24.3% 35.3% 13.8 113.4 54.3% 10.4% 27.6% 22.4
C 96% 76 +5.2 54 75 110.5 42 49.1% 79 13.9% 71 31.5% 71 24.8 69 105.3 66 49.0% 59 15.8% 27 30.8% 92 18.5
Guide to understanding this table

Offensive Overview

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN Usage PSA AST% AST:Usg TOV%
On Court 10-11 30.4 NOH 192 70 18.3% 28 100.0 33 5.0% 22 0.27 26 17.6%
PG
SG
SF
PF 80% 71 20.2% 24 98.4 27 5.1% 18 0.25 16 16.7%
C 20% 10.3% 114.3 4.5% 0.44 25.0%
On Court 10-11 30.4 TOR 140 47 15.6% 53 108.3 44 5.4% 40 0.35 69 12.2%
PG
SG
SF
PF 37% 15.7% 87.5 2.9% 0.18 17.6%
C 63% 15.5% 118.8 7.0% 0.45 9.4%
On Court 09-10 29.4 HOU 849 74 19.0% 26 100.8 69 8.8% 63 0.46 93 9.7%
PG
SG
SF
PF 4% 23.8% 112.5 0.0% 0.00 26.3%
C 96% 70 18.8% 17 100.3 70 9.1% 66 0.48 97 8.7%
Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Overall

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN eFG% 2P% 3P% FT% ASTD%
All
ASTD%
Rim
ASTD%
Mid
ASTD%
Three
On Court 10-11 30.4 NOH 192 39 49.2% 42 49.1% 33.3% 66.7% 9 80% 97 33% 24 83% 70 100%
PG
SG
SF
PF 80% 35 48.3% 25 45.8% 40.0% 66.7% 11 81% 96 33% 16 84% 64 100%
C 20% 57.1% 80.0% 0.0% 75% 75%
On Court 10-11 30.4 TOR 140 44 50.0% 62 51.4% 30.0% 100.0% 31 71% 100 0% 37 75% 70 100%
PG
SG
SF
PF 37% 37.5% 46.2% 0.0% 100.0% 83% 83%
C 63% 56.9% 54.5% 42.9% 100.0% 67% 0% 70% 100%
On Court 09-10 29.4 HOU 849 30 48.5% 20 46.7% 62 36.5% 43 68.9% 24 72% 45 61% 50 68% 93 96%
PG
SG
SF
PF 4% 60.0% 54.5% 50.0% 0.0% 50% 0% 40% 100%
C 96% 25 47.9% 14 46.3% 40 35.7% 52 71.2% 23 73% 40 63% 50 70% 96 96%
Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Frequency

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
% of Shot Attempts
Year Age Team MIN eFG% Rim Short
Mid
Long
Mid
All
Mid
Corner
Three
Non
Corner
All
Three
On Court 10-11 30.4 NOH 192 39 49.2% 1 14% 12 10% 97 58% 92 68% 0 0% 92 17% 90 17%
PG
SG
SF
PF 80% 35 48.3% 2 10% 12 10% 95 62% 88 72% 0 0% 87 17% 85 17%
C 20% 57.1% 0% 14% 57% 71% 0% 29% 29%
On Court 10-11 30.4 TOR 140 44 50.0% 2 17% 27 15% 91 47% 82 62% 0 0% 94 21% 92 21%
PG
SG
SF
PF 37% 37.5% 6% 12% 62% 75% 0% 19% 19%
C 63% 56.9% 17% 17% 41% 59% 0% 24% 24%
On Court 09-10 29.4 HOU 849 30 48.5% 5 17% 71 28% 74 32% 75 60% 75 1% 90 22% 87 22%
PG
SG
SF
PF 4% 60.0% 13% 27% 33% 60% 0% 27% 27%
C 96% 25 47.9% 1 18% 69 28% 83 32% 82 60% 81 1% 93 22% 91 22%
Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Accuracy

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
FG%
Year Age Team MIN eFG% Rim Short
Mid
Long
Mid
All
Mid
Corner
Three
Non
Corner
All
Three
On Court 10-11 30.4 NOH 192 39 49.2% 7 50% 100 71% 81 45% 95 49% 33% 33%
PG
SG
SF
PF 80% 35 48.3% 4 50% 100 67% 53 42% 83 45% 40% 40%
C 20% 57.1% 100% 75% 80% 0% 0%
On Court 10-11 30.4 TOR 140 44 50.0% 1 33% 76 43% 98 59% 99 55% 30% 30%
PG
SG
SF
PF 37% 37.5% 0% 0% 60% 50% 0% 0%
C 63% 56.9% 40% 60% 58% 59% 43% 43%
On Court 09-10 29.4 HOU 849 30 48.5% 16 54% 62 43% 83 45% 76 44% 0% 67 38% 62 36%
PG
SG
SF
PF 4% 60.0% 50% 100% 20% 56% 50% 50%
C 96% 25 47.9% 12 55% 47 41% 78 47% 75 44% 0% 67 37% 40 36%
Guide to understanding this table

Foul Drawing

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN FT% SFLD% FFLD% AND1%
On Court 10-11 30.4 NOH 192 66.7% 14 7.2% 41 1.2% 33 20.0%
PG
SG
SF
PF 80% 66.7% 22 8.1% 48 1.2% 34 20.0%
C 20% 0.0% 1.3%
On Court 10-11 30.4 TOR 140 100.0% 10 6.4% 6 0.6% 90 33.3%
PG
SG
SF
PF 37% 100.0% 0.0% 0.9%
C 63% 100.0% 9.7% 0.5% 33.3%
On Court 09-10 29.4 HOU 849 43 68.9% 11 7.2% 82 2.2% 34 20.0%
PG
SG
SF
PF 4% 0.0% 6.2% 1.2% 0.0%
C 96% 52 71.2% 6 7.2% 78 2.2% 40 20.8%
Guide to understanding this table

Defense and Rebounding

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN BLK% STL% FOUL% fgOR% fgDR% ftOR% ftDR%
On Court 10-11 30.4 NOH 192 42 1.5% 5 0.5% 31 5.9% 10 5.5% 42 15.8% 0 0.0% 94 46.2%
PG
SG
SF
PF 80% 66 1.5% 11 0.6% 14 6.1% 13 5.1% 65 17.5% 0 0.0% 90 46.2%
C 20% 1.5% 0.0% 5.1% 7.4% 7.7% 0.0%
On Court 10-11 30.4 TOR 140 24 1.2% 10 0.6% 84 3.5% 2 3.8% 68 18.7% 99 22.2% 30 22.2%
PG
SG
SF
PF 37% 2.3% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 14.9% 50.0% 25.0%
C 63% 0.6% 1.0% 4.9% 6.0% 21.1% 0.0% 20.0%
On Court 09-10 29.4 HOU 849 10 0.7% 26 0.7% 35 5.7% 13 6.2% 60 17.8% 42 2.4% 65 34.5%
PG
SG
SF
PF 4% 0.0% 1.2% 2.5% 9.1% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0%
C 96% 8 0.7% 24 0.7% 32 5.8% 10 6.1% 51 17.6% 46 2.4% 62 35.7%
Guide to understanding this table
The rest of this page is for subscribers only.
Already a member?
Click to login
    It includes:
  • On/off/position stats for team and opponent shooting by location
  • On/off/position stats for team and opponent play context (transition/half court/putbacks)
Try Insider stats free for one week,
then just $5/month after that
Subscribe Now