Jaden Springer
6'3" big21.8 years old #28 pick in 2021
Contract: $2.2M / $4.0M Team Salary Sheet

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Offense Defense
Year Age Team MIN Diff Exp W Pts/Poss eFG% TOV% ORB% FT Rate Pts/Poss eFG% TOV% ORB% FT Rate
On Court 23-24 21.1 BOS 106 99 +15.2 70 99 127.4 100 63.6% 11 15.9% 98 34.4% 0 8.7 82 112.2 44 55.3% 100 19.0% 14 29.6% 72 17.9
PG
SG
SF 8% -49.6 0 94.1 46.4% 17.6% 22.2% 21.4 143.8 80.8% 37.5% 40.0% 15.4
PF 79% +18.9 74 131.1 64.9% 15.6% 36.5% 8.9 112.3 55.9% 17.8% 25.3% 16.1
C 13% +32.7 81 125.0 65.2% 16.7% 30.8% 0.0 92.3 37.0% 15.4% 44.4% 30.4
On Court 23-24 21.1 PHI 277 20 -9.0 21 40 113.0 10 50.2% 94 11.7% 63 27.8% 99 27.7 11 122.0 5 59.0% 95 16.5% 18 29.2% 11 23.4
PG 13% +13.7 67 132.4 66.4% 13.2% 17.2% 30.9 118.7 61.4% 16.0% 26.7% 35.1
SG 66% 9 -12.8 14 12 106.9 1 47.0% 72 12.6% 66 28.5% 95 26.7 21 119.7 18 57.2% 95 17.2% 12 30.1% 17 22.3
SF 20% -10.4 20 120.9 51.4% 7.8% 30.5% 29.2 131.3 63.1% 14.8% 28.0% 20.4
PF
C
On Court 22-23 20.1 PHI 53 +10.9 65 122.0 51.7% 7.6% 34.4% 21.7 111.1 55.6% 15.4% 16.7% 36.0
PG 100% +11.7 66 122.0 51.7% 7.6% 34.4% 21.7 110.3 55.6% 15.5% 16.7% 33.7
SG 0% 200.0 0.0%
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Offensive Overview

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN Usage PSA AST% AST:Usg TOV%
On Court 23-24 21.1 BOS 106 45 14.6% 48 119.2 44 8.7% 42 0.59 6 20.0%
PG
SG
SF 8% 15.8% 50.0 0.0% 0.00 33.3%
PF 79% 13.5% 130.0 6.6% 0.49 19.2%
C 13% 21.4% 100.0 30.0% 1.40 16.7%
On Court 23-24 21.1 PHI 277 45 15.5% 9 97.4 45 10.6% 51 0.69 2 17.7%
PG 13% 18.5% 114.3 13.8% 0.75 37.0%
SG 66% 55 16.7% 5 89.7 55 12.2% 57 0.73 12 14.4%
SF 20% 9.9% 125.0 4.5% 0.46 15.4%
PF
C
On Court 22-23 20.1 PHI 53 18.5% 126.1 14.0% 0.76 7.8%
PG 100% 18.5% 126.1 14.0% 0.76 7.8%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Overall

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN eFG% 2P% 3P% FT% ASTD%
All
ASTD%
Rim
ASTD%
Mid
ASTD%
Three
On Court 23-24 21.1 BOS 106 31 54.5% 92 69.2% 22.2% 87.5% 100 36% 99 0% 95 40% 25 100%
PG
SG
SF 8% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
PF 79% 58.8% 63.6% 33.3% 85.7% 33% 0% 25% 100%
C 13% 50.0% 100.0% 0.0% 50% 0% 100%
On Court 23-24 21.1 PHI 277 5 41.9% 30 48.8% 2 19.2% 100.0% 80 62% 84 46% 45 62% 0 100%
PG 13% 41.7% 50.0% 25.0% 100.0% 50% 0% 100%
SG 66% 5 41.2% 18 45.5% 4 21.1% 100.0% 86 58% 97 29% 47 62% 0 100%
SF 20% 45.5% 62.5% 0.0% 100.0% 80% 80%
PF
C
On Court 22-23 20.1 PHI 53 61.9% 58.8% 50.0% 75.0% 42% 38% 50% 50%
PG 100% 61.9% 58.8% 50.0% 75.0% 42% 38% 50% 50%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Frequency

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
% of Shot Attempts
Year Age Team MIN eFG% Rim Short
Mid
Long
Mid
All
Mid
Corner
Three
Non
Corner
All
Three
On Court 23-24 21.1 BOS 106 31 54.5% 18 28% 93 36% 0 0% 83 36% 61 8% 78 28% 71 36%
PG
SG
SF 8% 0.0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
PF 79% 58.8% 24% 41% 0% 41% 0% 35% 35%
C 13% 50.0% 25% 25% 0% 25% 25% 25% 50%
On Court 23-24 21.1 PHI 277 5 41.9% 79 37% 86 25% 41 4% 71 29% 75 23% 3 11% 17 33%
PG 13% 41.7% 17% 17% 0% 17% 50% 17% 67%
SG 66% 5 41.2% 62 27% 97 31% 54 6% 88 37% 72 24% 4 12% 16 35%
SF 20% 45.5% 55% 18% 0% 18% 18% 9% 27%
PF
C
On Court 22-23 20.1 PHI 53 61.9% 52% 26% 4% 30% 4% 13% 17%
PG 100% 61.9% 48% 29% 5% 33% 5% 14% 19%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Accuracy

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
FG%
Year Age Team MIN eFG% Rim Short
Mid
Long
Mid
All
Mid
Corner
Three
Non
Corner
All
Three
On Court 23-24 21.1 BOS 106 31 54.5% 93 80% 96 62% 0 98 62% 0% 29% 22%
PG
SG
SF 8% 0.0% 0% 0%
PF 79% 58.8% 75% 57% 57% 33% 33%
C 13% 50.0% 100% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0%
On Court 23-24 21.1 PHI 277 5 41.9% 39 62% 20 32% 90 67% 31 36% 4 24% 12% 2 20%
PG 13% 41.7% 100% 0% 0% 33% 0% 25%
SG 66% 5 41.2% 7 50% 51 38% 93 67% 60 42% 25% 17% 4 22%
SF 20% 45.5% 83% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
PF
C
On Court 22-23 20.1 PHI 53 61.9% 80% 33% 0% 29% 0% 67% 50%
PG 100% 61.9% 80% 33% 0% 29% 0% 67% 50%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Foul Drawing

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN FT% SFLD% FFLD% AND1%
On Court 23-24 21.1 BOS 106 87.5% 49 12.0% 23 0.8% 0 0.0%
PG
SG
SF 8% 100.0% 0.0% 5.3%
PF 79% 85.7% 15.0% 0.5% 0.0%
C 13% 0.0% 0.0%
On Court 23-24 21.1 PHI 277 100.0% 91 11.8% 34 0.6% 46 22.2%
PG 13% 100.0% 28.6% 4.1% 50.0%
SG 66% 100.0% 58 8.8% 3 0.2% 0 0.0%
SF 20% 100.0% 16.7% 0.0% 50.0%
PF
C
On Court 22-23 20.1 PHI 53 75.0% 8.7% 0.0% 0.0%
PG 100% 75.0% 8.7% 0.0% 0.0%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Defense and Rebounding

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN BLK% STL% FOUL% fgOR% fgDR% ftOR% ftDR%
On Court 23-24 21.1 BOS 106 68 2.1% 100 4.2% 5 5.9% 26 5.4% 10 11.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
PG
SG
SF 8% 0.0% 10.5% 5.3% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0%
PF 79% 2.0% 3.6% 4.2% 6.8% 11.0% 0.0% 0.0%
C 13% 3.6% 3.6% 17.9% 0.0% 6.2% 0.0% 0.0%
On Court 23-24 21.1 PHI 277 97 1.9% 99 2.7% 3 5.8% 96 7.4% 36 9.4% 0 0.0% 29 6.2%
PG 13% 1.5% 5.5% 11.0% 4.2% 14.8% 0.0% 20.0%
SG 66% 98 2.0% 96 2.9% 5 4.8% 91 6.4% 36 8.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
SF 20% 1.8% 0.8% 6.1% 12.3% 8.3% 0.0% 0.0%
PF
C
On Court 22-23 20.1 PHI 53 1.0% 1.4% 7.2% 5.0% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0%
PG 100% 1.0% 1.4% 7.2% 5.0% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table
The rest of this page is for subscribers only.
Already a member?
Click to login
    It includes:
  • On/off/position stats for team and opponent shooting by location
  • On/off/position stats for team and opponent play context (transition/half court/putbacks)
Try Insider stats free for one week,
then just $5/month after that
Subscribe Now