Clarence Weatherspoon /// Stats /// Cleaning the Glass

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

								Offense										Defense
	Year	Age	Team	MIN	Diff		Exp W	Pts/Poss		eFG%		TOV%		ORB%		FT Rate		Pts/Poss		eFG%		TOV%		ORB%		FT Rate
On Court	04-05	34.1	HOU	516	87	+5.8	56	78	107.4	89	50.6%	82	14.5%	6	26.1%	52	24.9	83	101.6	91	45.5%	7	13.4%	93	27.6%	52	24.9
PG
SG
SF
PF				76%	85	+6.2	58	46	104.4	63	49.0%	39	16.2%	18	27.4%	45	25.2	90	98.2	90	44.8%	6	13.3%	99	24.3%	56	24.8
C				24%	79	+4.6	52	98	117.0	99	55.4%	100	8.9%	1	21.6%	44	24.1	13	112.4	71	47.4%	12	13.7%	4	37.5%	54	25.0
On Court	03-04	33.1	HOU	632	24	-5.7	25	20	97.1	63	47.5%	9	19.3%	30	29.1%	57	23.1	48	102.9	32	48.4%	28	15.3%	97	26.5%	48	23.3
PG
SG
SF
PF				50%	35	-4.0	30	31	98.6	51	47.2%	5	20.5%	48	30.4%	65	24.4	55	102.6	50	47.7%	40	16.0%	82	27.9%	64	22.3
C				50%	20	-7.4	21	13	95.7	64	47.9%	20	18.0%	21	27.8%	42	21.9	45	103.1	30	49.1%	13	14.6%	98	25.1%	50	24.3
On Court	03-04	33.1	NYK	208	43	-2.6	34	51	101.6	82	48.8%	9	19.2%	62	31.4%	36	21.5	35	104.2	93	43.6%	0	11.7%	100	22.5%	1	37.4
PG
SG
SF				2%		-66.7	0		88.9		50.0%		33.3%		33.3%		33.3		155.6		50.0%		11.1%		40.0%		40.0
PF				71%	81	+6.2	57	78	105.5	94	50.6%	21	18.3%	50	30.7%	31	20.8	78	99.3	97	41.3%	0	11.7%	100	19.3%	4	38.8
C				27%		-20.6	5		92.3		43.8%		20.2%		32.7%		22.7		112.9		48.9%		11.9%		30.0%		33.3

Guide to understanding this table

Offensive Overview

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	Usage		PSA		AST%		AST:Usg		TOV%
On Court	04-05	34.1	HOU	516	25	11.1%	21	108.0	36	4.8%	41	0.44	88	12.0%
PG
SG
SF
PF				76%	12	10.7%	12	101.2	15	4.8%	29	0.45	69	13.8%
C				24%	43	12.2%	40	125.8	41	4.9%	41	0.40	99	6.8%
On Court	03-04	33.1	HOU	632	43	12.8%	60	126.1	25	5.1%	28	0.40	70	14.9%
PG
SG
SF
PF				50%	19	11.4%	49	120.5	17	4.5%	22	0.40	76	13.2%
C				50%	64	14.3%	62	130.7	52	5.7%	44	0.40	62	16.4%
On Court	03-04	33.1	NYK	208	22	10.9%	84	138.5	81	10.1%	93	0.93	39	18.8%
PG
SG
SF
PF				71%	16	10.6%	98	152.0	56	9.2%	86	0.86	5	24.2%
C				27%		12.0%		114.3		10.7%		0.89		6.9%

Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Overall

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	eFG%		2P%			FT%		ASTD% All		ASTD% Rim		ASTD% Mid		ASTD% Three
On Court	04-05	34.1	HOU	516	11	41.6%	13	41.6%		92	81.8%	21	74%	11	73%	41	76%	0
PG
SG
SF
PF				76%	4	37.0%	5	37.0%		92	84.6%	15	80%	4	80%	29	80%	0
C				24%	76	53.1%	76	53.1%			71.4%	52	65%	30	67%	69	60%	0
On Court	03-04	33.1	HOU	632	81	50.6%	84	50.9%	0.0%	36	66.0%	61	64%	78	52%	32	79%	0
PG
SG
SF
PF				50%	29	44.0%	39	44.6%	0.0%	56	73.3%	52	67%	91	40%	15	89%	0
C				50%	98	56.0%	98	56.0%			56.5%	64	63%	61	58%	59	70%	0
On Court	03-04	33.1	NYK	208	32	45.0%	34	45.0%			94.7%	27	72%	16	70%	45	75%	0
PG
SG
SF
PF				71%	73	50.0%	72	50.0%			92.3%	42	69%	13	75%	74	60%	0
C				27%		35.7%		35.7%			100.0%		80%		50%		100%

Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Frequency

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

							% of Shot Attempts
	Year	Age	Team	MIN	eFG%		Rim		Short Mid		Long Mid		All Mid		Corner Three		Non Corner		All Three
On Court	04-05	34.1	HOU	516	11	41.6%	36	36%	60	26%	77	38%	78	64%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
PG
SG
SF
PF				76%	4	37.0%	37	31%	64	25%	77	44%	79	69%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
C				24%	76	53.1%	53	50%	61	28%	49	22%	48	50%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
On Court	03-04	33.1	HOU	632	81	50.6%	63	50%	34	20%	65	30%	40	49%	83	1%	0	0%	70	1%
PG
SG
SF
PF				50%	29	44.0%	78	49%	26	17%	64	32%	31	49%	80	1%	0	0%	74	1%
C				50%	98	56.0%	59	51%	35	22%	61	27%	43	49%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
On Court	03-04	33.1	NYK	208	32	45.0%	36	38%	68	30%	73	32%	71	62%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
PG
SG
SF
PF				71%	73	50.0%	47	38%	75	31%	62	31%	63	62%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
C				27%		35.7%		36%		29%		36%		64%		0%		0%		0%

Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Accuracy

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

							FG%
	Year	Age	Team	MIN	eFG%		Rim		Short Mid		Long Mid		All Mid		Corner Three		Non Corner	All Three
On Court	04-05	34.1	HOU	516	11	41.6%	27	54%	39	34%	43	35%	33	35%
PG
SG
SF
PF				76%	4	37.0%	1	40%	51	40%	26	33%	30	36%
C				24%	76	53.1%	96	75%	10	22%	76	43%	24	31%
On Court	03-04	33.1	HOU	632	81	50.6%	34	55%	49	36%	98	53%	95	46%		0%			0%
PG
SG
SF
PF				50%	29	44.0%	5	41%	52	38%	95	54%	93	49%		0%			0%
C				50%	98	56.0%	88	67%	42	35%	95	52%	90	44%
On Court	03-04	33.1	NYK	208	32	45.0%	89	67%	4	17%	88	46%	23	32%
PG
SG
SF
PF				71%	73	50.0%	99	80%	12	25%	44	38%	19	31%
C				27%		35.7%		40%		0%		60%		33%

Guide to understanding this table

Foul Drawing

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	FT%
On Court	04-05	34.1	HOU	516	92	81.8%
PG
SG
SF
PF				76%	92	84.6%
C				24%		71.4%
On Court	03-04	33.1	HOU	632	36	66.0%
PG
SG
SF
PF				50%	56	73.3%
C				50%		56.5%
On Court	03-04	33.1	NYK	208		94.7%
PG
SG
SF
PF				71%		92.3%
C				27%		100.0%

Guide to understanding this table

Defense and Rebounding

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	BLK%		STL%		FOUL%		fgOR%		fgDR%		ftOR%		ftDR%
On Court	04-05	34.1	HOU	516	11	0.6%	33	0.9%	24	6.7%	38	7.9%	60	16.7%	0	0.0%	18	18.8%
PG
SG
SF
PF				76%	22	0.7%	43	1.1%	15	6.2%	43	7.5%	64	16.7%	0	0.0%	19	17.4%
C				24%	3	0.4%	0	0.0%	9	8.3%	49	9.3%	53	16.7%	0	0.0%	28	22.2%
On Court	03-04	33.1	HOU	632	27	1.2%	81	1.7%	76	4.1%	78	10.5%	48	15.7%	63	4.8%	4	8.9%
PG
SG
SF
PF				50%	57	1.8%	93	2.1%	91	2.9%	94	11.4%	17	12.7%	86	9.5%	23	19.2%
C				50%	2	0.5%	63	1.2%	43	5.3%	58	9.5%	76	19.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%
On Court	03-04	33.1	NYK	208	2	0.5%	76	1.6%	85	3.6%	30	7.7%	43	15.3%	0	0.0%	35	23.1%
PG
SG
SF
PF				71%	4	0.4%	69	1.6%	83	3.2%	20	6.4%	69	17.5%	0	0.0%	55	30.0%
C				27%		1.0%		1.7%		5.0%		10.9%		8.5%		0.0%		0.0%

Guide to understanding this table