CLEVELAND CAVALIERSCLEVELAND

2019-20 Season

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank compared to all lineups with at least 100 possessions played.
Percentiles for the "Totals" row are compared to player on-court data. This is because the samples in lineups are generally very small, so the percentiles for the totals wouldn't properly convey how good or bad each stat is.
Only lineups with at least 15 possessions played are displayed.
Offense Defense
PG SG SF PF C Poss Diff Pts/Poss eFG% TOV% ORB% FT Rate Pts/Poss eFG% TOV% ORB% FT Rate
Totals 4020 13 -8.8 26 106.2 38 51.8% 6 17.2% 87 27.9% 20 17.3 13 115.0 11 55.3% 13 12.6% 58 24.7% 95 15.3
C.Sext D.Garl C.Osma K.Love T.Thom 1164 22 -9.0 37 107.0 43 52.7% 18 16.8% 80 28.8% 42 15.4 22 116.1 15 58.4% 19 11.8% 53 23.9% 96 9.5
C.Sext D.Garl C.Osma L.Nanc T.Thom 206 28 -7.2 13 96.6 14 46.5% 7 19.4% 84 29.2% 29 13.9 67 103.8 66 50.3% 36 13.3% 40 25.2% 81 12.4
D.Garl J.Clar K.Port L.Nanc J.Hens 124 70 +10.0 84 119.4 86 59.8% 14 17.7% 63 26.2% 16 12.5 45 109.4 46 53.1% 11 10.9% 68 22.4% 41 18.6
C.Sext M.Dell C.Osma K.Love T.Thom 120 66 +8.3 65 115.0 62 55.8% 1 20.8% 94 32.7% 73 21.2 55 106.7 93 44.7% 2 8.4% 95 16.2% 20 23.0
M.Dell J.Clar K.Port K.Love L.Nanc 104 3 -28.3 1 84.6 1 40.0% 55 13.5% 2 12.3% 86 24.7 33 112.9 62 51.1% 98 20.8% 11 30.2% 18 23.1
M.Dell J.Clar K.Port A.McKi L.Nanc 84 +0.7 114.3 51.9% 10.7% 24.4% 20.8 113.6 64.1% 16.0% 12.9% 15.6
M.Dell J.Clar K.Port L.Nanc T.Thom 79 +3.5 100.0 47.2% 24.1% 33.3% 16.9 96.5 47.4% 17.6% 15.6% 10.3
M.Dell J.Clar K.Port L.Nanc J.Hens 75 -3.2 125.3 56.5% 12.0% 31.7% 9.1 128.6 70.0% 19.5% 38.5% 12.3
C.Sext D.Garl C.Osma K.Love L.Nanc 67 +7.2 126.9 60.8% 16.4% 32.3% 9.2 119.7 58.8% 15.2% 24.1% 37.3
C.Sext J.Clar C.Osma L.Nanc T.Thom 61 -26.2 116.4 47.5% 6.6% 39.5% 25.4 142.6 64.9% 6.6% 14.3% 22.8
C.Sext J.Clar C.Osma K.Love T.Thom 57 +37.3 128.1 57.4% 10.5% 25.0% 20.4 90.8 46.5% 12.3% 20.6% 10.5
C.Sext D.Garl K.Port C.Osma T.Thom 50 -50.2 94.0 42.2% 26.0% 42.9% 20.0 144.2 56.4% 9.6% 53.6% 23.6
C.Sext J.Clar C.Osma K.Love L.Nanc 45 +23.9 135.6 59.5% 15.6% 15.8% 45.9 111.6 55.9% 2.3% 20.0% 29.4
C.Sext D.Garl K.Port K.Love T.Thom 36 -11.1 88.9 39.2% 22.2% 36.0% 10.8 100.0 51.8% 18.9% 25.0% 28.6
C.Sext D.Garl A.McKi C.Osma T.Thom 35 -37.3 114.3 60.3% 22.9% 50.0% 17.2 151.6 50.0% 6.5% 45.8% 11.9
C.Sext B.Knig C.Osma K.Love T.Thom 35 -5.7 94.3 48.3% 17.1% 5.6% 17.2 100.0 53.1% 14.3% 18.8% 3.1
J.Clar B.Knig K.Port K.Love L.Nanc 34 -51.3 94.1 50.0% 20.6% 11.8% 18.5 145.5 71.0% 6.1% 18.2% 12.9
C.Sext D.Garl K.Port L.Nanc T.Thom 33 +27.0 124.2 52.9% 9.1% 31.6% 14.7 97.2 41.2% 2.8% 26.1% 20.6
C.Sext J.Clar K.Port L.Nanc T.Thom 32 +0.5 115.6 51.5% 15.6% 42.1% 5.9 115.2 52.8% 9.1% 42.1% 0.0
D.Garl J.Clar K.Port L.Nanc T.Thom 31 -29.5 77.4 37.5% 9.7% 15.8% 10.7 106.9 50.0% 17.2% 21.4% 19.2
D.Garl J.Clar K.Port K.Love T.Thom 30 +23.7 133.3 58.9% 3.3% 14.3% 25.0 109.7 53.2% 12.9% 29.4% 3.2
D.Garl D.Exum K.Port L.Nanc J.Hens 29 +17.2 89.7 44.0% 13.8% 18.8% 16.0 72.4 32.0% 13.8% 10.5% 20.0
D.Garl J.Clar C.Osma K.Love T.Thom 27 -22.2 88.9 57.5% 40.7% 36.4% 5.0 111.1 48.1% 11.1% 29.4% 14.8
M.Dell J.Clar A.McKi K.Love L.Nanc 25 -0.7 108.0 52.3% 20.0% 25.0% 18.2 108.7 55.0% 17.4% 27.3% 15.0
D.Garl D.Exum A.McKi C.Osma J.Hens 24 +41.0 125.0 64.3% 20.8% 20.0% 14.3 84.0 42.9% 36.0% 53.8% 14.3
C.Sext M.Dell C.Osma L.Nanc T.Thom 23 -12.3 104.3 43.8% 8.7% 20.0% 12.5 116.7 50.0% 12.5% 8.3% 27.3
M.Dell J.Clar C.Osma L.Nanc T.Thom 23 +39.1 126.1 47.4% 17.4% 27.3% 57.9 87.0 42.1% 17.4% 16.7% 21.1
M.Dell J.Clar C.Osma K.Love T.Thom 23 -23.0 87.0 47.5% 17.4% 25.0% 5.0 110.0 52.4% 10.0% 9.1% 0.0
D.Garl B.Knig D.Exum A.McKi A.Zizi 22 +40.9 127.3 63.9% 13.6% 37.5% 27.8 86.4 44.4% 13.6% 18.2% 16.7
C.Sext D.Garl K.Port K.Love L.Nanc 21 -55.6 76.2 34.8% 9.5% 31.2% 0.0 131.8 61.9% 13.6% 55.6% 14.3
C.Sext M.Dell K.Port K.Love T.Thom 20 -102.6 45.0 26.5% 15.0% 7.7% 0.0 147.6 66.7% 0.0% 44.4% 14.3
C.Sext D.Garl K.Port C.Osma J.Hens 20 +0.3 95.0 55.9% 20.0% 25.0% 0.0 94.7 42.1% 15.8% 30.8% 10.5
C.Sext J.Clar K.Port K.Love L.Nanc 19 -32.8 105.3 47.4% 10.5% 45.5% 10.5 138.1 70.0% 9.5% 28.6% 5.0
C.Sext D.Garl D.Exum C.Osma J.Hens 19 -49.7 105.3 47.2% 15.8% 30.0% 16.7 155.0 79.4% 15.0% 60.0% 23.5
C.Sext D.Garl A.McKi K.Love L.Nanc 19 +36.6 131.6 45.2% 5.3% 33.3% 28.6 95.0 53.1% 5.0% 9.1% 12.5
C.Sext M.Dell C.Osma K.Love J.Hens 19 +15.8 115.8 50.0% 5.3% 36.4% 4.8 100.0 64.3% 22.2% 0.0% 0.0
C.Sext J.Clar K.Port K.Love T.Thom 19 -57.9 100.0 40.9% 36.8% 64.3% 4.5 157.9 82.4% 21.1% 50.0% 11.8
D.Garl B.Knig A.McKi C.Osma A.Zizi 18 -48.5 77.8 28.1% 11.1% 23.1% 31.3 126.3 42.9% 0.0% 33.3% 28.6
C.Sext M.Dell K.Port L.Nanc T.Thom 18 -17.8 61.1 31.8% 33.3% 22.2% 36.4 78.9 41.2% 15.8% 10.0% 5.9
C.Sext J.Clar K.Port C.Osma T.Thom 18 -36.3 116.7 63.3% 16.7% 50.0% 13.3 152.9 68.4% 0.0% 28.6% 0.0
D.Garl J.Clar C.Osma L.Nanc T.Thom 18 +5.6 150.0 61.4% 11.1% 40.0% 0.0 144.4 70.6% 0.0% 42.9% 11.8
D.Garl J.Clar K.Port K.Love L.Nanc 18 -6.5 111.1 50.0% 22.2% 20.0% 25.0 117.6 63.3% 29.4% 28.6% 6.7
J.Clar K.Port A.McKi L.Nanc J.Hens 18 -44.4 88.9 57.1% 22.2% 14.3% 0.0 133.3 61.8% 11.1% 33.3% 17.6
D.Garl D.Exum K.Port A.McKi J.Hens 18 +0.7 88.9 43.8% 16.7% 33.3% 12.5 88.2 42.3% 17.6% 22.2% 30.8
D.Garl B.Knig A.McKi K.Love T.Thom 18 -51.3 72.2 40.6% 16.7% 20.0% 0.0 123.5 62.5% 0.0% 0.0% 6.3
C.Sext D.Garl J.Clar K.Love T.Thom 17 -104.8 76.5 34.6% 17.6% 27.3% 30.8 181.3 69.0% 6.2% 55.6% 0.0
C.Sext D.Garl A.McKi K.Love T.Thom 17 +35.6 141.2 67.6% 17.6% 42.9% 5.9 105.6 72.7% 22.2% 0.0% 27.3
D.Garl D.Exum C.Osma K.Love T.Thom 17 -38.9 100.0 40.0% 17.6% 22.2% 33.3 138.9 54.8% 0.0% 36.4% 9.5
C.Sext B.Knig C.Osma L.Nanc T.Thom 17 -49.7 105.9 53.3% 11.8% 25.0% 13.3 155.6 73.3% 11.1% 50.0% 40.0
C.Sext B.Knig A.McKi K.Love T.Thom 16 +11.3 131.3 56.7% 12.5% 57.1% 26.7 120.0 54.2% 6.7% 0.0% 41.7
C.Sext D.Exum C.Osma K.Love L.Nanc 16 -43.8 56.3 27.8% 37.5% 14.3% 44.4 100.0 50.0% 20.0% 25.0% 7.1
M.Dell D.Exum K.Port K.Love L.Nanc 15 +6.7 120.0 57.1% 13.3% 33.3% 14.3 113.3 53.8% 6.7% 10.0% 23.1
C.Sext D.Garl C.Osma L.Nanc A.Zizi 15 +26.7 120.0 46.9% 6.7% 37.5% 18.8 93.3 59.1% 20.0% 16.7% 9.1
Guide to understanding this table
The rest of this page is for subscribers only.
Already a member?
Click to login
    It includes:
  • Lineup shooting stats by location, offense and defense
  • Lineup play context stats (transition/half court/putbacks), offense and defense
Try Insider stats free for one week,
then just $5/month after that
Subscribe Now