SACRAMENTO KINGSSACRAMENTO
Team Efficiency and Four Factors
Team Efficiency and Four Factors
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank for all games played by all teams in that stat for the season.
Gray rows indicate playoff games.
Download this table
Offense | Defense | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date | Opp | Team Pts |
Opp Pts |
Spread | Pts/Poss | eFG% | TOV% | ORB% | FT Rate | Pts/Poss | eFG% | TOV% | ORB% | FT Rate | ||||||||||||||
% | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | |||||||||
11/29/23 | vs. | LAC | L | 117 | 131 | +1.0 | 71 | 121.3 | 53 | 54.8% | 54 | 13.8% | 72 | 31.8% | 88 | 28.9 | 6 | 135.8 | 15 | 61.5% | 2 | 6.3% | 64 | 24.4% | 54 | 18.7 | ||
11/28/23 | vs. | GSW | W | 124 | 123 | -2.0 | 59 | 116.3 | 42 | 52.8% | 87 | 9.6% | 33 | 23.7% | 90 | 30.0 | 41 | 116.3 | 26 | 57.9% | 91 | 19.2% | 83 | 20.0% | 7 | 32.5 | ||
11/24/23 | @ | MIN | W | 124 | 111 | +4.5 | 81 | 125.3 | 71 | 57.5% | 61 | 13.1% | 80 | 34.0% | 4 | 9.0 | 65 | 108.9 | 70 | 51.2% | 81 | 17.8% | 54 | 26.7% | 5 | 33.3 | ||
11/22/23 | @ | NOP | L | 112 | 117 | -1.5 | 52 | 114.3 | 58 | 55.3% | 31 | 16.3% | 4 | 15.9% | 98 | 38.7 | 38 | 117.3 | 71 | 51.1% | 15 | 10.2% | 34 | 30.6% | 7 | 32.2 | ||
11/20/23 | @ | NOP | L | 93 | 129 | -1.5 | 2 | 91.5 | 2 | 41.7% | 58 | 13.4% | 15 | 19.6% | 54 | 20.8 | 6 | 135.4 | 11 | 62.3% | 29 | 12.2% | 5 | 40.0% | 50 | 19.5 | ||
11/19/23 | @ | DAL | W | 129 | 113 | +1.5 | 94 | 136.0 | 94 | 64.6% | 69 | 12.4% | 66 | 30.8% | 50 | 19.5 | 43 | 115.9 | 49 | 54.4% | 22 | 11.4% | 70 | 22.7% | 42 | 21.5 | ||
11/17/23 | @ | SAS | W | 129 | 120 | -8.5 | 72 | 121.7 | 94 | 64.7% | 60 | 13.2% | 0 | 9.1% | 62 | 22.4 | 52 | 113.5 | 45 | 55.0% | 53 | 14.4% | 91 | 18.0% | 44 | 21.1 | ||
11/15/23 | @ | LAL | W | 125 | 110 | +1.0 | 57 | 115.7 | 75 | 58.3% | 43 | 14.8% | 34 | 24.0% | 18 | 13.5 | 86 | 101.9 | 30 | 57.2% | 97 | 21.5% | 94 | 16.7% | 65 | 16.9 | ||
11/13/23 | vs. | CLE | W | 132 | 120 | -1.0 | 98 | 141.9 | 100 | 72.8% | 82 | 10.8% | 25 | 22.2% | 37 | 17.3 | 20 | 125.0 | 33 | 56.7% | 27 | 12.0% | 21 | 33.3% | 72 | 15.7 | ||
11/10/23 | vs. | OKC | W | 105 | 98 | +2.0 | 26 | 106.1 | 20 | 48.9% | 16 | 18.2% | 88 | 35.8% | 39 | 17.6 | 89 | 100.0 | 81 | 48.9% | 69 | 16.3% | 72 | 22.4% | 76 | 14.9 | ||
11/08/23 | vs. | POR | W | 121 | 118 | -8.0 | 52 | 114.2 | 38 | 52.2% | 11 | 18.9% | 89 | 36.5% | 92 | 31.5 | 57 | 111.3 | 39 | 55.8% | 74 | 17.0% | 83 | 20.0% | 23 | 25.6 | ||
11/06/23 | @ | HOU | L | 97 | 122 | -2.0 | 1 | 88.2 | 5 | 43.2% | 10 | 19.1% | 41 | 25.6% | 25 | 15.3 | 3 | 138.2 | 2 | 68.5% | 15 | 10.3% | 93 | 17.4% | 3 | 37.0 | ||
11/04/23 | @ | HOU | L | 89 | 107 | -2.5 | 5 | 95.6 | 10 | 45.7% | 71 | 12.1% | 6 | 17.0% | 23 | 14.6 | 44 | 115.4 | 47 | 54.7% | 20 | 11.0% | 52 | 27.1% | 79 | 14.1 | ||
11/01/23 | @ | GSW | L | 101 | 102 | +6.5 | 24 | 105.2 | 14 | 47.2% | 36 | 15.6% | 85 | 35.2% | 55 | 20.9 | 73 | 106.3 | 46 | 54.9% | 88 | 18.8% | 81 | 20.5% | 71 | 16.0 | ||
10/29/23 | vs. | LAL | W | 132 | 127 | -2.5 | 60 | 116.8 | 57 | 55.3% | 91 | 8.8% | 6 | 16.9% | 32 | 16.3 | 47 | 114.4 | 64 | 52.1% | 18 | 10.8% | 63 | 24.6% | 18 | 26.8 | ||
10/27/23 | vs. | GSW | L | 114 | 122 | -3.0 | 35 | 108.7 | 25 | 50.5% | 56 | 13.6% | 50 | 27.8% | 57 | 21.5 | 38 | 117.3 | 9 | 63.2% | 84 | 18.3% | 81 | 20.5% | 80 | 13.8 | ||
10/25/23 | @ | UTA | W | 130 | 114 | -1.5 | 82 | 125.5 | 65 | 56.5% | 75 | 11.8% | 59 | 29.1% | 36 | 17.0 | 62 | 109.9 | 71 | 51.1% | 46 | 13.9% | 40 | 29.2% | 20 | 26.4 |
The rest of this page is for subscribers only.
Already a member?
Click to login
Click to login
- It includes:
- Team shooting stats by location
- Team and opponent play context stats (transition/half court/putbacks)