PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERSPORTLAND

2018-19 Season

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank compared to all lineups with at least 100 possessions played.
Percentiles for the "Totals" row are compared to player on-court data. This is because the samples in lineups are generally very small, so the percentiles for the totals wouldn't properly convey how good or bad each stat is.
Only lineups with at least 15 possessions played are displayed.
Offense Defense
PG SG SF PF C Poss Diff Pts/Poss eFG% TOV% ORB% FT Rate Pts/Poss eFG% TOV% ORB% FT Rate
Totals 1222 18 -7.8 19 105.7 59 52.9% 45 14.2% 21 23.6% 1 13.3 26 113.5 44 52.8% 4 11.3% 59 25.4% 74 18.5
E.Turn S.Curr N.Stau Z.Coll M.Leon 376 44 +2.2 42 109.6 58 54.9% 67 12.5% 22 21.2% 18 13.1 53 107.4 77 49.4% 5 8.9% 64 22.9% 67 15.1
E.Turn S.Curr N.Stau C.Swan Z.Coll 107 35 -1.9 0 87.9 0 42.0% 34 15.0% 6 16.9% 35 16.0 98 89.7 97 43.8% 74 15.9% 85 20.3% 33 20.2
E.Turn S.Curr R.Hood J.Laym Z.Coll 103 85 +19.2 56 113.6 82 57.8% 38 14.6% 29 22.7% 24 14.4 96 94.4 99 41.3% 93 18.7% 0 42.2% 31 20.4
E.Turn S.Curr N.Stau M.Hark Z.Coll 102 14 -12.3 53 112.7 55 54.5% 63 12.7% 10 18.4% 65 20.2 5 125.0 10 58.9% 58 14.4% 11 31.4% 41 18.9
E.Turn S.Curr J.Laym Z.Coll M.Leon 83 -11.3 124.1 64.4% 13.3% 31.4% 12.3 135.4 67.1% 9.8% 21.2% 17.8
E.Turn S.Curr R.Hood Z.Coll E.Kant 63 -23.3 111.1 50.0% 12.7% 37.1% 12.9 134.4 63.8% 7.8% 22.2% 20.7
E.Turn S.Curr R.Hood J.Laym E.Kant 54 -36.4 85.2 47.8% 16.7% 17.2% 6.7 121.6 56.4% 11.8% 16.7% 19.1
E.Turn S.Curr R.Hood Z.Coll M.Leon 41 +7.6 119.5 52.4% 4.9% 21.7% 11.9 111.9 52.4% 7.1% 27.3% 7.1
E.Turn N.Stau J.Laym Z.Coll M.Leon 33 -12.5 93.9 43.5% 15.2% 35.0% 12.9 106.5 50.0% 6.5% 0.0% 32.0
E.Turn S.Curr N.Stau A.Amin Z.Coll 25 +44.0 144.0 72.7% 16.0% 22.2% 18.2 100.0 52.6% 16.7% 9.1% 21.1
E.Turn S.Curr N.Stau J.Laym Z.Coll 20 -55.5 90.0 42.5% 20.0% 42.9% 5.0 145.5 65.9% 13.6% 55.6% 13.6
E.Turn S.Curr R.Hood J.Laym M.Leon 17 +35.3 158.8 86.7% 11.8% 33.3% 6.7 123.5 63.3% 11.8% 28.6% 13.3
E.Turn S.Curr J.Laym Z.Coll E.Kant 17 +52.6 100.0 44.1% 5.9% 16.7% 11.8 47.4 20.6% 10.5% 20.0% 11.8
E.Turn A.Simo N.Stau J.Laym Z.Coll 13 -54.5 53.8 28.6% 30.8% 0.0% 42.9 108.3 50.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0
E.Turn S.Curr R.Hood M.Hark E.Kant 13 -32.1 84.6 27.3% 23.1% 50.0% 45.5 116.7 60.0% 25.0% 40.0% 20.0
E.Turn S.Curr J.Laym M.Hark Z.Coll 12 -16.0 91.7 56.2% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0 107.7 46.2% 0.0% 25.0% 15.4
E.Turn A.Simo N.Stau Z.Coll M.Leon 12 -16.7 83.3 55.6% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0 100.0 55.0% 15.4% 20.0% 20.0
E.Turn S.Curr N.Stau A.Amin J.Nurk 12 0.0 100.0 50.0% 8.3% 42.9% 0.0 100.0 45.5% 10.0% 28.6% 0.0
E.Turn N.Stau J.Laym A.Amin Z.Coll 11 -54.5 63.6 35.7% 45.5% 40.0% 28.6 118.2 60.0% 9.1% 16.7% 10.0
E.Turn W.Bald N.Stau J.Laym M.Leon 10 -24.4 120.0 75.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0 144.4 68.8% 22.2% 33.3% 25.0
E.Turn N.Stau J.Laym M.Hark Z.Coll 10 -85.5 60.0 33.3% 10.0% 14.3% 0.0 145.5 57.7% 9.1% 60.0% 7.7
E.Turn A.Simo J.Laym Z.Coll M.Leon 10 -70.0 70.0 50.0% 40.0% 25.0% 0.0 140.0 62.5% 10.0% 40.0% 50.0
E.Turn S.Curr N.Stau M.Hark M.Leon 8 -51.4 137.5 62.5% 25.0% 33.3% 12.5 188.9 116.7% 22.2% 50.0
E.Turn A.Simo G.Tren J.Laym S.Labi 8 -12.5 150.0 75.0% 12.5% 33.3% 0.0 162.5 66.7% 0.0% 50.0% 83.3
E.Turn S.Curr J.Laym A.Amin Z.Coll 8 +81.9 137.5 64.3% 12.5% 0.0% 28.6 55.6 31.2% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0
E.Turn S.Curr J.Laym M.Hark M.Leon 6 -78.6 50.0 21.4% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0 128.6 58.3% 0.0% 33.3% 33.3
E.Turn S.Curr G.Tren J.Laym Z.Coll 5 +60.0 100.0 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 40.0 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 75.0
E.Turn S.Curr N.Stau M.Hark J.Nurk 4 -133.3 0.0 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0 133.3 66.7% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0
E.Turn S.Curr R.Hood M.Hark Z.Coll 4 -66.7 0.0 0.0% 25.0% 33.3% 0.0 66.7 25.0% 33.3% 33.3% 0.0
E.Turn A.Simo R.Hood Z.Coll M.Leon 4 -75.0 150.0 100.0% 0.0% 0.0 225.0 100.0% 0.0% 25.0
E.Turn W.Bald N.Stau Z.Coll M.Leon 4 -155.0 25.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0 180.0 100.0% 20.0% 100.0% 25.0
E.Turn R.Hood J.Laym Z.Coll M.Leon 3 -200.0 0.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 200.0 100.0% 0.0% 0.0
E.Turn J.Laym M.Hark A.Amin E.Kant 3 +33.3 100.0 75.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 66.7 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0
E.Turn S.Curr N.Stau A.Amin M.Leon 3 -13.3 66.7 50.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0 80.0 16.7% 0.0% 60.0% 33.3
E.Turn S.Curr M.Hark A.Amin J.Nurk 3 -200.0 66.7 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 266.7 100.0% 0.0% 0.0
E.Turn S.Curr J.Laym A.Amin J.Nurk 3 -100.0 133.3 66.7% 66.7% 100.0% 0.0 233.3 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 150.0
E.Turn S.Curr N.Stau Z.Coll J.Nurk 3 -33.3 100.0 75.0% 66.7% 100.0% 0.0 133.3 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0
E.Turn R.Hood J.Laym Z.Coll E.Kant 2 -33.3 200.0 100.0% 0.0% 0.0 233.3 125.0% 0.0% 100.0
E.Turn S.Curr J.Laym M.Hark J.Nurk 2 -200.0 0.0 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0 200.0 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0
E.Turn S.Curr R.Hood A.Amin E.Kant 2 +50.0 150.0 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0 100.0 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0
E.Turn A.Simo G.Tren J.Laym Z.Coll 1 100.0 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0
E.Turn J.Laym M.Hark Z.Coll E.Kant 1 -100.0 300.0 150.0% 0.0% 0.0 400.0 100.0% 0.0% 200.0
E.Turn S.Curr N.Stau J.Laym C.Swan 1 0.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0
Guide to understanding this table
The rest of this page is for subscribers only.
Already a member?
Click to login
    It includes:
  • Lineup shooting stats by location, offense and defense
  • Lineup play context stats (transition/half court/putbacks), offense and defense
Try Insider stats free for one week,
then just $5/month after that
Subscribe Now